This morning’s headline in the Telegraph:
“Al-Qaeda’s Syrian wing takes over the oilfields once belonging to Assad”
Many if not most of the Syrian rebels are linked to “al Qaeda,” (they are terrorists anyway) and are supported and funded by the U.S. The article in the Telegraph attempts to isolate this particular group of “al-Qaeda” members, but that is false reporting.
What I find interesting here is that U.S. government backed rebels are first going after the oilfields. Were they instructed to do this by their U.S. handlers? Is getting control of the oilfields a U.S. priority? I’m sorry to insult my reader’s intelligence. Of course stealing the oil and natural resources of other countries is always a U.S. priority! One only has to look at U.S. enimies and past history in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, northern Africa, Libya, among others, and look at the next planned regions of American empiracle conquest in Central Asia and the Caucusus.
While the rebels who have taken over the oilfields in Jabhat are now selling it locally, expect U.S. intervention in that process, and confiscation in the future. That is almost a certainty, as is bringing in U.S. and British oil companies to run, control and profit from the theft of Syria’s oil!