Just yesterday, I made the comment that the Boston bombing fiasco could in part have been used to help advance U.S. war in Syria, and already today, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the White House is reconsidering arming Syrian rebels. (U.S. funded terrorists)
This threat to arm U.S. backed terrorists is supposedly due to a “confirmation” that chemical weapons had been used in Syria by the government of Assad. The more likely scenario is that any chemical weapons were supplied by the U.S. to the rebels who used them against innocents in that country. This murderous tactic would help advance the U.S. agenda of affecting regime change by removing Assad and installing a U.S. puppet.
From a story in the Washington Free Beacon:
“We’re clearly on an upward trajectory,” a senior White House official told the Washington Post. “We’ve moved over to assistance that has a direct military purpose.”
The White House has repeatedly said that the use of chemical weapons would cross a “redline” that would necessitate further action by the United States.
How long will it be until the U.S. is fully embroiled in the Syrian conflict? Sibel Edmunds believes that it will be very soon and I tend to agree with her studied assessment.
Close monitoring of this situation is warranted, because any direct and open U.S. military intervention in Syria will be a stepping stone to the next U.S. targeted imperial invasion. That will most likely be somewhere in Central Asia or the Caucasus region.